How to Choose the Right Feature Prioritization Framework

Prioritizing features is a crucial task for product managers. It involves making difficult decisions and ensuring that limited resources are allocated effectively. With so many feature prioritization frameworks available, it can be overwhelming to determine which one is the right fit for your needs. In this article, we will explore various frameworks and guide you in selecting the most suitable one for your product.

What is prioritization framework?

A prioritization framework is a systematic approach used to determine the order in which features or tasks should be addressed. It provides a structured way to evaluate and compare different factors, such as the value of the feature, the effort required to implement it, and the potential impact on users.

Section Image

By using a prioritization framework, product managers can make informed decisions and align their team's efforts with the overall product strategy.

One common prioritization framework used in product management is the MoSCoW method. This method categorizes features or tasks into four priority levels: Must-haves, Should-haves, Could-haves, and Won't-haves. By clearly defining these priorities, product teams can focus on delivering the most critical features first, ensuring that the core functionality of the product is solid before moving on to less essential elements.

Another popular prioritization technique is the Value vs. Complexity matrix, where features are plotted based on their perceived value to the user and the level of effort required for implementation. This visual representation helps product teams identify high-value, low-effort tasks that can have a significant impact on user satisfaction and product success. By leveraging such frameworks, product managers can optimize their product development process and deliver value to customers in a strategic and efficient manner.

What are the 4 categories for prioritization?

When it comes to prioritization, most frameworks categorize features into four main categories:

Section Image

  1. High Priority: These are the features that are essential for the product's success and have a significant impact on user satisfaction. Examples of high priority features could include core functionalities that are crucial for the product to function, key user experience improvements, or critical bug fixes that directly affect user retention and engagement.

  2. Moderate Priority: Features in this category are important but may not be critical. They contribute to the overall value of the product. Some examples of moderate priority features could be additional functionalities that enhance the user experience, performance optimizations that improve loading times, or minor design updates that refine the product's aesthetics.

  3. Low Priority: These features have a lower impact on the product's success and can be deprioritized if necessary. Low priority features may include nice-to-have functionalities that are not essential for the core product offering, minor enhancements that do not significantly impact user satisfaction, or updates that cater to a small subset of users.

  4. No Priority: Features that fall into this category are often nice-to-haves or may not align with the product strategy. They can be postponed or removed from consideration. Examples of features with no priority could be experimental functionalities that do not have a clear business case, outdated features that are rarely used by customers, or ideas that do not align with the current market trends.

When prioritizing features, it's essential to consider not only the impact of each feature but also the effort required for implementation. High priority features that are complex to develop may need to be broken down into smaller tasks or require more resources to ensure timely delivery. On the other hand, low priority features that are quick wins with minimal effort could be considered for fast implementation to provide incremental value to users.

What are the main levels of prioritizing tasks?

Prioritizing tasks can be done at different levels:

  • Strategic Level: This level focuses on long-term goals and aligning the product roadmap with the overall business strategy.

  • Tactical Level: Here, the focus is on executing the roadmap and delivering value to the users.

  • Operational Level: At this level, the emphasis is on daily tasks and ensuring smooth product development and delivery.

Consider the level of prioritization that suits your product and prioritize accordingly.

Another important level of prioritizing tasks is the Resource Allocation Level: This level involves allocating resources effectively to ensure that the most critical tasks are completed on time and within budget. It requires a thorough understanding of the available resources, such as manpower, budget, and time, to make informed decisions on task prioritization.

Furthermore, Risk Management Level is crucial in prioritizing tasks. This level involves assessing and mitigating risks associated with different tasks. By prioritizing tasks based on their potential impact on project success and identifying high-risk tasks early on, project managers can proactively address challenges and minimize potential roadblocks.

9 product prioritization frameworks for product managers

There are numerous product prioritization frameworks available, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Let's explore some widely used frameworks:

Section Image


The RICE framework is a popular method that takes into account the reach, impact, confidence, and effort required for each feature. By assigning scores to these factors, product managers can estimate the potential value of implementing a feature.

For example, when considering the reach of a feature, product managers analyze how many users will be affected by its implementation. They also assess the impact it will have on those users and the overall product. Additionally, confidence is evaluated by considering the level of certainty in the data and assumptions used to make decisions. Lastly, the effort required to develop and release the feature is taken into account, including engineering time, design resources, and any potential dependencies.

Value vs Effort

As the name suggests, this framework assesses the value of a feature against the effort required to implement it. It helps product managers identify low-hanging fruits and prioritize features with high value and low effort.

When using the Value vs Effort framework, product managers analyze the potential value a feature will bring to users and the business. They consider factors such as user demand, market trends, and revenue potential. Simultaneously, they evaluate the effort required to develop and release the feature, including technical complexity, resource availability, and potential risks. By comparing the value and effort, product managers can make informed decisions on which features to prioritize.

Kano model

The Kano model categorizes features based on their impact on customer satisfaction. It classifies features into three categories: basic, performance, and delighters. This framework enables product managers to focus on features that provide a delightful user experience.

When using the Kano model, product managers assess the impact of each feature on customer satisfaction. Basic features are considered essential and expected by users, while performance features enhance the product's functionality and performance. Delighters are features that exceed customer expectations and create a positive emotional response. By understanding these categories, product managers can prioritize features that not only meet user needs but also create a memorable and enjoyable user experience.

Story Mapping

Story mapping is a visual framework that helps product managers define and prioritize user stories. By breaking down the user journey into smaller chunks, product managers can identify dependencies and prioritize features accordingly.

When using story mapping, product managers create a visual representation of the user journey, from the initial interaction to the desired outcome. They break down the journey into user stories, which represent specific tasks or actions. By mapping out these stories and their dependencies, product managers gain a holistic view of the product's functionality. This allows them to prioritize features based on their impact on the user journey and the overall user experience.

The MoSCoW Method

This framework classifies features into four categories: must-haves, should-haves, could-haves, and won't-haves. It allows product managers to focus on delivering the most critical features while deprioritizing others.

When using the MoSCoW method, product managers categorize features based on their importance and urgency. Must-haves are essential features that must be implemented to meet user needs and achieve business objectives. Should-haves are important but not critical, while could-haves are desirable but not necessary. Won't-haves are features that are intentionally excluded from the current scope. This framework helps product managers prioritize features based on their impact and align them with the product roadmap and business goals.

Opportunity scoring

This framework evaluates features based on the potential business opportunity they represent. By assigning scores to features in terms of market demand, revenue potential, and strategic fit, product managers can prioritize features that align with the overall business objectives.

When using opportunity scoring, product managers assess the market demand for a feature by analyzing user feedback, market research, and competitive analysis. They also evaluate the revenue potential of a feature by considering factors such as pricing models and monetization strategies. Additionally, they assess the strategic fit of a feature with the overall business objectives and long-term vision. By assigning scores to these criteria, product managers can prioritize features that have the highest potential for business success.

The product tree

The product tree framework helps product managers define and visualize the core components and features of a product. By prioritizing features in each branch of the tree, product managers can ensure a balanced and comprehensive approach to feature development.

When using the product tree framework, product managers create a hierarchical structure that represents the different components and features of the product. Each branch of the tree represents a specific area or functionality. By prioritizing features within each branch, product managers ensure that all aspects of the product are considered and developed in a balanced manner. This framework helps product managers maintain a holistic view of the product and avoid overlooking important features or functionalities.

Cost of delay

This framework factors in the cost of delaying the implementation of a feature. By considering the potential revenue loss or missed business opportunities, product managers can prioritize features that have a higher cost of delay.

When using the cost of delay framework, product managers analyze the potential impact of delaying the implementation of a feature. They consider factors such as revenue loss, missed market opportunities, and potential negative effects on user satisfaction. By quantifying the cost of delay, product managers can prioritize features that have the highest potential for negative consequences if not implemented in a timely manner. This framework helps product managers make data-driven decisions and prioritize features that have a significant impact on business success.

Buy a feature

The "Buy a Feature" framework involves allocating a budget to different features and allowing stakeholders to "buy" the features they prioritize. This collaborative approach helps product managers understand the true value of features and make data-driven decisions.

When using the "Buy a Feature" framework, product managers allocate a budget to different features based on their estimated value and impact. They then invite stakeholders, such as customers, internal teams, or external partners, to "buy" the features they believe are most valuable. This collaborative approach helps product managers gain insights into the priorities and perspectives of different stakeholders. By considering the collective input and budget allocation, product managers can make informed decisions on feature prioritization.

Each prioritization framework has its own unique characteristics and benefits. Consider the nature of your product, team dynamics, and the specific challenges you face to determine which framework is the most appropriate for your needs.

Remember, the ultimate goal of feature prioritization is to deliver value to your users and achieve business objectives. Be flexible and open to adjusting your prioritization framework as your product evolves and market conditions change.

With the right prioritization framework in place, you can make informed decisions, optimize resource allocation, and deliver a product that meets the needs of your users. So, take the time to explore different frameworks, experiment, and find the one that works best for your product management journey.

Last Updated:

Kareem Mayan

Kareem is a co-founder at Savio. He's been prioritizing customer feedback professionally since 2001. He likes tea and tea snacks, and dislikes refraining from eating lots of tea snacks.

Want more articles like this?

Product Leaders from Slack, Zapier, and Appcues read our newsletter to delight customers, lower churn, and grow revenue.

Prioritize high-value Feature Requests

Centralize customer feedback from HubSpot, Intercom, and Slack.

Prioritize high-value features sorted by churned revenue or MRR.

Close the loop for Sales and CS by automating status updates from JIRA.

Learn more


Centralize, Organize, and Prioritize Your GTM Team Feature Requests

Centralize customer Feature Requests from Slack, HubSpot, Intercom, Zendesk, SFDC, Help Scout, and more.